College? Math? Science? Algebra? their future?
The
longer we're at this unschooling life, and the older our boys are, the
more I hear these questions. The questions come from extended family, or
folks new to unschooling, and sometimes from those who choose to use a
curriculum (or several) to homeschool their child because they wanted
him or her to get more education, to be better prepared for "the real
world"; essentially so their child can be ahead of the game.
Honestly,
I've never understood the desire for a child to be 'ahead of the game',
or the appeal of a child scoring above grade level in a test, for
example, or having the best grades in his class. Is there some kind of
race no one told me about? Is there proof that the faster a person
learns something, the better he'll be at it; that somehow knowing
everything a year, or two, or several, before his peers will guarantee
success in life?
I've always thought it more likely
that information crammed in at a faster rate is more likely to be
forgotten at a faster rate. That's absolutely how my brain works. Well,
unless I'm learning something I consider valuable, something I can use
today and tomorrow and the next day. When I'm learning something that
matters to me and improves the quality of my actual life today -- not
just the potential quality of my life in some far-off future day -- I
can pick it up like wildfire and remember all I need to know.
Learning
something that might someday help me to be more successful -- to take
on more work -- in a topic that really doesn't interest me? I can cram
enough info into my head to answer enough questions to pass a test and
get the piece of paper showing I learned the material. After all, I did
manage to graduate high school, and I can assure you that what I learned
in Algebra and Applied Chemistry was learned in just that fashion. Do I
remember enough of those subjects to pass a test today? No way! I
would look like a complete idiot on a high school Chem exam today.
That's because in my day-to-day life, the curriculum of that Chemistry
class is useless.
People ask me "how do your children
learn math?" (or science, or whatever subject it is they've been told is
both essential and hard to learn -- usually something they themselves
didn't take to quickly or well. Hence the fear.) My first instinct is
to ask them how much of that subject they use in daily life. If their
grasp of that subject is good, then they don't need to worry their child
won't learn it. If their grasp of the subject isn't as good as they've
been told it should be, it's likely because they don't need that subject
in the depth schools attempt to teach. They've forgotten (or never
really learned it) because it has no value in their life today.
Higher math isn't a big deal for many people in their
everyday lives. And really, it's not even something we as parents worry
about. Our boys can do all the math they need for day to day life. If
and when they need to know more math, we're sure they will learn what
they need. We will be there to help them find the right classes, the
right books, to help with homework if they want our help. Most
importantly, we give them our confidence and trust that they can learn
whatever it is they need to know. Our reason for that confidence is
that, so far, we've all managed to learn whatever we need to know to
have the life we want; so far they've learned all they need to know (and
along the way, their learning has taught us a lot, too!)
People spend our whole life learning new things; at
least we should expect to learn new things for most of our lives. So why
all the rush to have children learn everything they'll ever need in the
space of 18 or 24 years? Does a child walk any better because he
learned at 9 months instead of 17 months? Does someone read better as an
adult if he learned to read at 4 than if he learned to read at 8 or
12? Does a person become good at math only if he started learning math
at all the 'right' points in childhood? Does someone become a good
writer of great novels only if he learned to write well in high school,
or college?
For me, the real core of unschooling
is trusting, coming to know in your bones, that you, your child --- that
people everywhere -- don't need to know everything, and we certainly
don't need to learn those things on the same schedule. What we do need
is the confidence that we can learn whatever we need, to handle whatever
life throws our way. Our children need the confidence that they can
learn anything they need to learn, when that learning will support the
life they want.
So often, people have this idea that
somehow all these subjects taught in school, often the same subjects we
struggled with ourselves, must be *important* and our children must
learn them now, or at least on the same schedule as all the other children. Many people have the idea that homeschooling should make
children better educated, that they should be better prepared for
college, academically advanced. I think, too, that we risk making our
child's educational success very important in validating the choices we
make, and whether or not we're good parents.
It's not that it's less important to me that our kids be successful, just that I define success differently. I also have different ideas about what kind of education is important for a person to have. I define success as happy and capable, strong and confident. I think lifelong learning is more important than completing an education.
It's not that it's less important to me that our kids be successful, just that I define success differently. I also have different ideas about what kind of education is important for a person to have. I define success as happy and capable, strong and confident. I think lifelong learning is more important than completing an education.
No comments:
Post a Comment