College? Math? Science? Algebra? their future? 
The 
longer we're at this unschooling life, and the older our boys are, the 
more I hear these questions. The questions come from extended family, or
 folks new to unschooling, and sometimes from those who choose to use a 
curriculum (or several) to homeschool their child because they wanted 
him or her to get more education, to be better prepared for "the real 
world"; essentially so their child can be ahead of the game. 
Honestly,
 I've never understood the desire for a child to be 'ahead of the game',
 or the appeal of a child scoring above grade level in a test, for 
example, or having the best grades in his class.  Is there some kind of 
race no one told me about? Is there proof that the faster a person 
learns something, the better he'll be at it; that somehow knowing 
everything a year, or two, or several, before his peers will guarantee 
success in life? 
I've always thought it more likely 
that information crammed in at a faster rate is more likely to be 
forgotten at a faster rate.  That's absolutely how my brain works. Well,
 unless I'm learning something I consider valuable, something I can use 
today and tomorrow and the next day. When I'm learning something that 
matters to me and improves the quality of my actual life today -- not 
just the potential quality of my life in some far-off future day -- I 
can pick it up like wildfire and remember all I need to know.  
Learning
 something that might someday help me to be more successful -- to take 
on more work -- in a topic that really doesn't interest me? I can cram 
enough info into my head to answer enough questions to pass a test and 
get the piece of paper showing I learned the material. After all, I did 
manage to graduate high school, and I can assure you that what I learned
 in Algebra and Applied Chemistry was learned in just that fashion.  Do I
 remember enough of those subjects to pass a test today? No way!  I 
would look like a complete idiot on a high school Chem exam today.  
That's because in my day-to-day life, the curriculum of that Chemistry 
class is useless. 
People ask me "how do your children 
learn math?" (or science, or whatever subject it is they've been told is
 both essential and hard to learn -- usually something they themselves 
didn't take to quickly or well. Hence the fear.)  My first instinct is 
to ask them how much of that subject they use in daily life. If their 
grasp of that subject is good, then they don't need to worry their child 
won't learn it.  If their grasp of the subject isn't as good as they've 
been told it should be, it's likely because they don't need that subject
 in the depth schools attempt to teach. They've forgotten (or never 
really learned it) because it has no value in their life today. 
Higher math isn't a big deal for many people in their 
everyday lives. And really, it's not even something we as parents worry 
about. Our boys can do all the math they need for day to day life. If 
and when they need to know more math, we're sure they will learn what 
they need. We will be there to help them find the right classes, the 
right books, to help with homework if they want our help. Most 
importantly, we give them our confidence and trust that they can learn 
whatever it is they need to know.  Our reason for that confidence is 
that, so far, we've all managed to learn whatever we need to know to 
have the life we want; so far they've learned all they need to know (and
 along the way, their learning has taught us a lot, too!)
People spend our whole life learning new things; at 
least we should expect to learn new things for most of our lives. So why
 all the rush to have children learn everything they'll ever need in the
 space of 18 or 24 years? Does a child walk any better because he 
learned at 9 months instead of 17 months? Does someone read better as an
 adult if he learned to read at 4 than if he learned to read at 8 or 
12?  Does a person become good at math only if he started learning math 
at all the 'right' points in childhood? Does someone become a good 
writer of great novels only if he learned to write well in high school, 
or college? 
For me, the real core of unschooling 
is trusting, coming to know in your bones, that you, your child --- that
 people everywhere -- don't need to know everything, and we certainly 
don't need to learn those things on the same schedule.  What we do need 
is the confidence that we can learn whatever we need, to handle whatever
 life throws our way.  Our children need the confidence that they can 
learn anything they need to learn, when that learning will support the 
life they want.
So often, people have this idea that 
somehow all these subjects taught in school, often the same subjects we 
struggled with ourselves, must be *important* and our children must 
learn them now, or at least on the same schedule as all the other children.  Many people have the idea that homeschooling should make 
children better educated, that they should be better prepared for 
college, academically advanced. I think, too, that we risk making our 
child's educational success very important in validating the choices we 
make, and whether or not we're good parents. 
It's not that it's less important to me that our kids be successful, just that I define success differently. I also have different ideas about what kind of education is important for a person to have. I define success as happy and capable, strong and confident. I think lifelong learning is more important than completing an education.
It's not that it's less important to me that our kids be successful, just that I define success differently. I also have different ideas about what kind of education is important for a person to have. I define success as happy and capable, strong and confident. I think lifelong learning is more important than completing an education.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment